
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scanned Laser Cut Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mandiberg.com/2009/11/17/scanned-laser-cut-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mandiberg.com/2009/11/17/scanned-laser-cut-books/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:47:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: lindsay</title>
		<link>http://www.mandiberg.com/2009/11/17/scanned-laser-cut-books/comment-page-1/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mandiberg.com/?p=851#comment-909</guid>
		<description>hey, i&#039;ve been thinking on this since your last post about it. I LOVE how you see hands in photocopies. It&#039;s one of my favorite academic &quot;haptic&quot; moments, when you notice the hand, even the fingerprint patterns, of whoever photocopied what you&#039;re reading. Here in UC, we photocopy stuff a lot. Everything I submit to electronic reserves has to be photocopied first, before they push it through a scanner. 

Anyway, my point is that I get it and love the hands. But I also enjoy hand moments most when they are varied, inconsistent, sloppy, the hallmark of mechanically repeating a task that isn&#039;t that important. Like you&#039;d see a pinky finger around the edge on one photocopy, then maybe one wrist at an angle on another. Your even, two-handed approach makes me envision this hilarious anal person freaking out over their copies, yet unable to figure out how to hide hands or crop, which seems like their real desire. &amp; maybe that&#039;s what you want.

Anyway, yes, hands, like. I miss your body in your work. Loved that in college, was so important to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, i&#8217;ve been thinking on this since your last post about it. I LOVE how you see hands in photocopies. It&#8217;s one of my favorite academic &#8220;haptic&#8221; moments, when you notice the hand, even the fingerprint patterns, of whoever photocopied what you&#8217;re reading. Here in UC, we photocopy stuff a lot. Everything I submit to electronic reserves has to be photocopied first, before they push it through a scanner. </p>
<p>Anyway, my point is that I get it and love the hands. But I also enjoy hand moments most when they are varied, inconsistent, sloppy, the hallmark of mechanically repeating a task that isn&#8217;t that important. Like you&#8217;d see a pinky finger around the edge on one photocopy, then maybe one wrist at an angle on another. Your even, two-handed approach makes me envision this hilarious anal person freaking out over their copies, yet unable to figure out how to hide hands or crop, which seems like their real desire. &amp; maybe that&#8217;s what you want.</p>
<p>Anyway, yes, hands, like. I miss your body in your work. Loved that in college, was so important to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

